OnlyFansAPI is the incumbent unified API. Fanduit matches its surface, 351 endpoints across OnlyFans and Fansly, MCP, and an AI suite, as an independent option at the same price.
# both are APIs — parity + independence Fanduit the programmable OnlyFans + Fansly layer OnlyFansAPI a comparable API provider → pick what you build on, not what boxes you in
We built Fanduit to full parity with OnlyFansAPI on purpose. If you want the same capabilities without being tied to one vendor, this is the honest trade: identical surface, a second supplier.
| Capability | Fanduit | OnlyFansAPI |
|---|---|---|
| Unified OnlyFans + Fansly API | ✓ | ✓ |
| Endpoint coverage | 351 | 350+ |
| MCP server for AI agents | 363 tools | yes |
| AI analytics + AI assistant | ✓ | ✓ |
| No-code (Zapier / Make / n8n) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Signed webhooks + metering | ✓ | ✓ |
| Independent second supplier | ✓ | ✗ |
| Established track record at scale | newer | ✓ |
Running Fanduit alongside or instead of OnlyFansAPI gives you a second supplier for the same surface, so one vendor is not a single point of failure.
Every endpoint is one row in a public registry that generates the route, the MCP tool, and the docs together, so the reference cannot drift from the API.
Free to start, then metered by requests-per-minute and credits, with the same tier structure. No premium to switch.
Fanduit is neutral infrastructure with no affiliation to either platform, built for creators and the agencies that run them.
We would rather you pick the right tool than oversell ours.
They are the incumbent with a longer track record and a large public-profile index built over years. Fanduit is newer. If proven-at-scale history is your only criterion, that is a fair point in their favor.
Fanduit matches the same capabilities and surface, which is deliberate for parity. The implementation, billing, and company are independent.
The concepts map closely (connect an account, call metered endpoints, receive webhooks). The main change is base URL, keys, and per-endpoint paths, which the reference documents.
A second supplier at full parity reduces vendor risk, and the declarative surface keeps docs and tools in sync. If you need a battle-tested incumbent above all, that is a valid reason to stay.
Same surface, a second supplier. Connect an account and compare for yourself.